I'll take "Things I Learned 28 Years Ago" for $400, Alex...
I
am better than average at trivia games.
That means I could probably beat you, but there are one or two people
you know who could take me to school. It
is not a measurement of smarts; it is 95% memory and the ability to access memory. The other 5% is a mixture of skills. Those skills seem to be even rarer than
trivia experts. There are ways to get an
edge in these games by analyzing the questions and playing the odds. It sounds like math, but it really
isn’t. I suck at math.
Trivia
has many interpretations. Not all the questions asked are from the same thought
process. I would like to split them into three categories. There are general knowledge questions, true trivia, and shit almost no one knows. General
knowledge exists in the realm of Jeopardy!
and Trivial Pursuit. These are mostly
questions from a base of knowledge you may have learned in school, or from
cultural or newsworthy sources: State capitals, wine, Oscar winners, the human
lungs, Ed Wood. There is some measureable likelihood of you
coming across general knowledge at some point in your life. Whether or not you remember it is the key. True trivia usually comes in the form of
multiple choice questions. How many pounds of cheese does the average
American consume? What is the average lifespan of a carpenter
ant? These are purely guessing games
based on very little prior knowledge.
Only the researchers who discovered the answer are the ones likely to
know the answer.
Then
there is shit nobody knows. In episode 2 of season 6, Homer Simpson
honks his horn how many times in front of Springfield Elementary? What
was NBA great Charles Barkley’s shoe size? These are questions for
extremists and nutballs. They were never
taught in school, and they are not from a framework of comprehension of
anything anyone would remember, including Simpsons
fans or basketball fans.
I
really only care about general knowledge.
I want to see if I remember or know things. If I wanted to play a guessing game, I would play
Deal or No Deal.
First
rule of general knowledge is ‘either you know it, or you don’t’. That’s the rule I use. If I am playing a game with someone who
obviously does not know the answer but is flummoxed with the possibility of
being wrong, I always say: “You know it
or you don’t. If you don’t, make a guess”. That is all there truly is to playing trivia
games. However, there is a way to
breaking down a question in a way that can either give you more confidence in
your guess, or eliminate options that you mistakenly think have potential.
Here
are few sample questions:
What is the capital of Canada?
This
is a ‘you know it, or you don’t’. There
is no way to reason through it. There are
no tricks. You could have it on the tip
of your tongue, but no deliberation will get you there if you don’t already
know it. If I had no clue, I would pick
the biggest city I knew in Canada and move on.
I would be wrong, but it would be an educated guess. Ottawa is the capital.
What 1994 Oscar-nominated film
featured Harvey Keitel as a character called “The Wolf”?
Here
is a question with details to consider.
It was a movie in 1994, it was good enough to get nominated for an
Oscar, and Harvey Keitel is in it. But
what if you had no idea it was Pulp
Fiction? Maybe you aren’t good with
either dates, or names, or a mixture of both? You know some movies, you have a
pretty good idea of who Harvey Keitel is, and you can at least place some of
this knowledge in 1990’s. What you have to do is dissect the question. You will now make an educated guess, but you
can increase your chances if you guess from the correct pool of contenders.
Some
people will immediately try to think of all the Oscar-nominated films they can,
especially ones in the 1990’s. They will
narrow it down and try to reason what movie in their brain would have a
character called The Wolf . Waste of
time. There are hundreds of films in
that pool. Forget the detail that the
film is Oscar-nominated. That is only
there to let you know that you’ve heard of the movie and it is a valid subject
for a trivia question.
What
you want to do is think of movies featuring Harvey Keitel. Smaller pool. He’s a veteran actor, but not a marquee name,
so significant movies are very few. If
you can rattle off any in your head, I think Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction,
an maybe Bad Lieutenant would pop
up. Now, you guess which one of those films
would be Oscar nominated and you have a better shot. In fact, if you start thinking Keitel, it
might bring you to Tarantino and it might jar your memory that he played The
Wolf.
What is the largest US city
named after a person?
This
was an actual Final Jeopardy! question.
It might be the best example of the thought process. There are two roads to go down: Largest US cities or cities named after
people. Which one is the smallest
pool? Hell yeah, it’s largest US
cities! Every other city in this country
is named after a person! If you start
whittling down the list of large US cities it won’t take long to get to the
answer, Houston. If you are darting
around the map in your brain looking for cities named after people, you will
run out of time or your head will explode.
Think about this: They want you to figure out the answer, and
they would not write a general knowledge question that is impossible to answer.
How many witches were burned at
the Salem Witch Trials?
This
as a Trivial Pursuit question from way back, but it also sounds like a classic
trick question. The answer is zero. Where people will get tripped up is trying to
gauge the severity of the Salem Witch Trials and estimate a high number, thinking
that is what the question is all about.
This brings up the most important skill.
You have to know why they ask the question. If the question has no concrete answer, like
a state capital or the name of the 39th president, then there is a
reason why the sentence itself was constructed.
The factoid is significant in
some way. It likely has an extreme. The reason this question was asked was there were
no witches as such, so only innocent women were burned. If the body count was not general knowledge,
and it is not, then there is no reason to ask the question.
Keep
this in mind: this also helps in sports questions. The most popular sports figures are still known
to non-sports fans. Michael Jordan,
Peyton Manning, Tom Brady, Wayne Gretzky, Michael Phelps and Usain Bolt. If you know nothing about basketball and the
question is “Who is the all-time leader in whatever…” Jordan is a good guess. These famous guys are the extremes in their
respective sports, so it’s a decent guess.
Gretzky – hockey. Phelps –
swimming. Bolt – track. Baseball teams – Yankees. Hockey Teams – Red Wings. Football teams – Cowboys and Steelers. The
best teams are famous because of their extremes.
This
certainly won’t help you if you can’t remember anything, but I have a theory
that people remember more than they let on.
My guess is they are just not sure.
It is just a game, and although there is supposed to be one answer, I
think taking two seconds to analyze the question itself will help guide the
arrow closer to the bullseye.
No comments:
Post a Comment